The letter clearly says confidential, doesn’t it?
And the reason it is confidential, the relevant person is disclosing his Full Name and Contact details. Do you think it’s not confidential?
Most importantly, if the letter is addressed to you and clearly states confidential, you CANNOT publish it on internet and THAT without hiding private information. This is gross and criminal. How do you expect the authorities to respond to other complaints when they know their private information are at risk of being publicised in complete disregard to the rule of law?
My question is here what is confidential,
Address of NAB known by every one and published and advertise by NAB itself
There is no contact detail of relavent person given, only his email address and in both letter email address is different look care fully.
Why i pointed out here this is so bureaucratic style to work just make things difficult don't create facilitation for common man. Un-till the so called ultra and overrated concept of confidentially not remove common man not get any benefits from the system.
At the end this system is for elite class not for common man.
I will see how a common man shall get a bail within 24 hrs Irfan Siddique got rom the same Judge, who refused to grant the bail and next day on pressure of Journalist and his ex- position grant the bail.
Just give me one example of any Ghulam mohammed /gul khan/ Allah Dita / bachal mitsry, etc